Sēcerne!

back

On Jews

Siege of Jerusalem

"Some Jews take words out of context and say, “We listen and we disobey,” “Hear! May you never hear,” and “Râ’ina!” [Herd us!]—playing with words and discrediting the faith. Had they said ˹courteously˺, “We hear and obey,” “Listen to us,” and “Unẓurna,” [Tend to us!] it would have been better for them and more proper. Allah has condemned them for their disbelief, so they do not believe except for a few."
Qur'an 4:46

"We forbade the Jews certain foods that had been lawful to them for their wrongdoing, and for hindering many from the Way of Allah, taking interest despite its prohibition, and consuming people’s wealth unjustly. We have prepared for the disbelievers among them a painful punishment."
Qur'an 4:160-161

"O believers! Take neither Jews nor Christians as allies for they are allies only to each other. Whoever does so will be counted as one of them. Surely Allah does not guide the wrongdoing people."
Qur'an 5:51

"the Jews said, “Allah is tight-fisted.”1 May their fists be tied and they be condemned for what they said. Rather, He is open-handed, giving freely as He pleases. That which has been revealed to you ˹O Prophet˺ from your Lord will only cause many of them to increase in wickedness and disbelief. We have stirred among them hostility and hatred until the Day of Judgment. Whenever they kindle the fire of war, Allah puts it out. And they strive to spread corruption in the land. And Allah does not like corruptors."
Qur'an 5:64

"Indeed, We took a covenant from the Children of Israel and sent them messengers. Whenever a messenger came to them with what they did not desire, they denied some and killed others."
Qur'an 5:70

"The disbelievers among the Children of Israel were condemned in the revelations of David and Jesus, son of Mary. That was for their disobedience and violations."
Qur'an 5:78

"You will surely find the most bitter towards the believers to be the Jews and polytheists and the most gracious to be those who call themselves Christian. That is because there are priests and monks among them and because they are not arrogant."
Qur'an 5:82

Any person who claims to be an intellectual, but has no disdain towards Jews must not be that much of an intellectual or is a Jew himself. I regard antisemitism as a tradition, it has been around for millenia, it is what connected the Islamic East and the Christian West. In many countries in Europe, it is illegal to be antisemitic, or to say antisemitic things. The shadow of German antisemitism never left Europe, The Jews will never forget what happened in Germany, as it is an example of when a Populace rises against them. Antisemitism as a Western tradition was killed in 1945. The year is of high significance. The Denazification process that happened in Germany and in the West in general didn't stop and has never stopped. The purpose of Denazification. was not to dispell authoritarian notions in the West, but to dispell antisemitism. It is terrifying to think this. To think that you were conditioned to be against this, so you disregard antisemitism, citing "hate" and "racism". When in fact, especially in this current age, the position of antisemitism is not a position of hate, but rather of love of your nation and faith.
You, dear reader, are probably living in an authoritarian state. You might be terrified by this assertion. You might be fooled by empty words, of democracy, of love, and of peace. But there is nothing peaceful of the era between 1945 and now. It has been an era of strife for the longest time, from the Cold War that immediately started, to the War on Terror and the internal strife happening in the West to perhaps the nuclear future against China. A state, cannot function without authority. To deny this is to be a fool, the very foundations of civilization is authority. Not to say, that authority is inherently good, but what I am saying is, an effective state must be authoritarian. And the utopian ideals of Marx, of the Neoliberals, that will never happen. What has been done by the governments of the World, is to use these ideals as bait, you do realize the failure of Marxism, dear reader? The Communists say, to achieve the end goal of a pure socialist state, we must first attain authority over the people and the industry. This might seem like a treachery to Marxist ideals, but what must be seen is that Marxist ideals were not betrayed, instead, the Marxist ideals were adapted to the reality of civilization, that it cannot sustain itself without authority. And so they say, "not real communism". What about, then, about the ephemeral socialist microstates that emerged in Europe after the Great War? Where they not real socialist states too?
One must see the parallels between Communism and Capitalism(or more accurately, Neoliberalism). The neoliberals too, after 1945, vowed to make a world, peaceful, free of strife, of hate and eventually of racism. And what of, now, are the neoliberal states of the West? During the Cold War, neoliberals had the CIA and the NSA, the extent of what they did even now we do not know. Then, they had the War on Terror, their enforcing of freedom in the Middle East, the killings of the enemies of Israel, Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden and Gaddafi, soon, Bashar Al-Assad and Khamenei. Then, now, with the enforcement of freedom too, in their on populace, against "hate crime", "bigotry", "racism". And also, in the recent election, with their very friendly statement, "there was no election fraud" and those who spoke of it, their posts hid from the public and disabled discussion about it:

Democracy

Dear reader, you have seen those who argue for the censorship of these statements, they say, "the common man cannot think for themselves", or "we cannot have people spreading disinformation". How, then, are these statements not authoritarian, when we see the Communists, in the USSR and China, using them? Are these statements not treacherous towards the Neoliberal ideals, of freedom and liberty?
There is a famous quote from John F. Kennedy in response to the building of the Berlin Wall by the government of East Germany, "Democracy is not perfect, but we have never had to put a wall up to keep our people in, to prevent them from leaving us." What does this mean? Why then, in a system similar in authoritarianism to that of Communism, people do not opt for something better? The answer is illusion. The greatest trick of the Jews is the illusion of choice. You think, in democracy, you choose who would lead your country, yet in the same time, you are manipulated into picking certain politicians, disregarding others. You think your vote matters, you vote for a party who will protect your tradition, yet these politicans are all the same. Like I said, the politicians all have ties with Jews, ALL OF THEM. Why did Donald Trump not "cross the rubicon" earlier this year? What has the Republican Conservatives conserved except the state of Israel? The dance of democracy is one of deception, you think Joe Biden or Donald Trump as president will change anything, yet everything stays the same with little changes. The Obama administration didn't end the wars started by Bush, but prolonged them and then started new wars for good measure, in Syria and Libya. Then the Trump Administration, which lessened the wars in the Middle East to certain extent, also kept the wars going, almost waging war on Iran, killing Qasem Soleimani. As Biden comes to power, do you really think things will change? Yes, things will only change for the worse. The differences between political parties are superficial, they are two sides of the same Jewish coin. Everything is administered by the Cathedral.